An answer engine quotes a passage, not a page, and the passages that get quoted have a shape. They answer the question in the first sentence, they carry the qualifying detail in the second, and they do not depend on the paragraph above them to make sense.
That is close to good writing anyway, which is the part I like about it. It is not a trick. It is being direct earlier than most published SEO content manages.
Where I am less sure is how far to take it. A page written entirely in self contained passages reads like a reference rather than an argument, and for some topics the argument is the value. I have settled on keeping the direct answer near the top and letting the rest of the page be a normal piece of writing, but that is a preference and not a measurement.
Has anyone tested the same page written both ways against the same set of prompts, with enough repetition to trust the difference?
Swiss Knife SEO ModeratorAdministrator